Showing posts with label Dr Vivian Balakrishnan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dr Vivian Balakrishnan. Show all posts

Friday, 20 June 2008

NAT by Gambling Suppression Branch

A government study on gambling released in May 2008 found more Singaporeans are picking it up in their teenage years.

1st June 2008, Vivian Balakrishnan was speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the Community Sports Festival: 'When people start earlier, their sense of judgement and restraint may not be well developed. And once young gamblers get hooked on their habit, they face the danger of it becoming a lifetime of addiction.'

Tell it to the Head of Gambling Suppression Branch, Chia Tang Heng!!

********************ooOoo********************

An email was cc to PM Lee Hsien Loong.

RE : NAT (No Action Taken) by Gambling Suppression Branch

27th September 2004, I called GSB to make a report about some students of MacPherson Secondary school who were collecting and making illegal football bets on the European Premier League. The duty officer that day was Joseph. I gave him my contact number and e-mail. NAT.

29th September 2004, I faxed a complaint to the Head of GSB. NAT.

From 4th October to 14th October 2004, I tried to contact Joseph regarding the complaint. I called 1800 435 0000, the Operator put me through. I called almost daily, in the morning, in the afternoon and in the evening, for almost 10 days. Nobody picked up the phone. I faxed Joseph on 14th October 2004. NAT.

I then spoke to a couple of police officers who advised me to make a police report at a police station. I made a police report at Marine Parade NPC on 18th October 2004 with my husband. After taking down statements from my hubby and I, the police office asked if anyone besides us knew about the case. I turned round, there were 5 people sitting right behind us waiting for their turns to make police reports.

"er.... yah. Now got 5 more people know."

My report number was G/20041018/0194D. I was given the name of AIO Vince Yeo and telephone number 6244 0000 to contact. NAT.

A few days later, Koh Kian Tat from GSB finally called me to take my statement. I went down to the Police Headquarters in Cantonment. He asked me to wait in the corridor while he went to get the key for an empty investigation room.

I heard loud and clear, he said to his colleagues in the room, "The char bo (derogatory remark for a woman) is here." I knew then I wouldn't be taken seriously. I was viewed as a nuisance. I handed him a tape that had more than a month of the recordings of the boys' betting conversations. NAT.

On 12th November 2004, I faxed Koh to inform him, my foreign students involved in this case were returning to their country on 23rd November 2004. NAT.

19th November 2004, I left a message for Koh to call me back. He called to say he had handed the case to his supervisor Lim Meng Ann. The file was sitting on Lim's table then. The foreign students could go back to their country first.

I asked Koh if he wanted the students' addresses and contact numbers in their countries, he said no need. He must be very happy that they were leaving. It seemed very obvious that GSB never intend to investigate this case.

Sunday, 1 June 2008

Singapore Tourism Board clarifies : AMCIS isn't 'official'

To :
Chairman Mr Wee Ee-chao
Singapore Tourism Board

Dear Mr Wee,
RE : AMCIS

I would like to bring your attention to the behaviour of the people of the above organization which STB supports.

Attached is a complaint that I made against them. You can judge for yourself.

I am appalled at the behaviour of some of the people in AMCIS. Because STB endorses them, they take it to mean they are 'official' and those who do not need the help of STB to find them foreign students as 'unofficial'.

I have been an 'unofficial' ambassador for Singapore for years, contributing to the economy of Singapore in my own small ways. I recruit foreign students to study in Singapore. Long before competitors organize summer courses in Singapore, I started doing that and when I approached the then STPB for help in 1990s, I was put to an 'ang moh'. He just told me to go to Inlingua as it can 'do everything' for me.

I don't need STB's assistance. There are many guardians who do not need STB's help. We are law-abiding citizens amd we would not do illegal things to jeopardize our business. It is our bread and butter, our families depend on it for a living. You should be glad we are independent but instead we are branded 'unofficial'.

I want STB to make clear its stand. AMCIS claims it is the officially appointed organization of STB to handle foreign students placement in Singapore, those who do not get endorsement from STB are 'unofficial' and illegal. I should be frightened? Such remarks were purposely made loud and clear to me in front of scores of foreign parents and students on 1st November 2004 at around 3.50 pm. And I was told, should I complain, he 'knows many ministers'. I am making my complaints because I want to know who are the ministers he claim to know.

I await STB's reply.

Jayne Goh
2nd November 2004

cc PM Lee Hsien Loong
Minister for Community Development, Youth and Sports - Dr Vivian Balakrishnan

****************************ooOoo****************************

STB's reply :

Dear Ms Goh
Re : Complaint on AMCIS

1. Thank you for your feedback of 2nd Nov 2004.

2. The incident that took place at the Principals Academy Certification testing on 1st Nov 2004 was regretful. STB has spoken to Mr Ezra Ng, Executive Director of Principals Academy Inc (PAI) and Mr Francis Zhan President, AMCIS to have abetter understanding on this matter. We understand that PAI had replied you on this matter. AMCIS had also provided a detailed explanation of this incident to PAI.

3. We wish to clarify that AMCIS is not the 'officially appointed organization' of STB as stated in your letter. From our investigations, AMCIS explained that they had used the term 'official' in the context of being invited to participate as one of the vendors by PAI. (What a lie! My foreign students and fellow guardians are witnesses to the claims by Francis Zhan.)

4. The arrangement between STB and AMCIS is not mutually exclusive and we are open to working with other organizations that can help us further our objective of promoting Singapore as a visitor-friendly destination. STB had supported the AMCIS Homestay programme , and its related components such as EduStay, as they were identified as promising initiatives in the area of accommodation and education services.

5. The EduStay component of the AMCIS Homestay programme was initiated by Education and Services Division of STB to serve the needs of international students who require board and lodging with guardianship. AMCIS, as an organisation, was approached to develop such a programme as they already possessed the infrastructure and services in the existing Homestay programme.

6 We hope that the above addresses your concerns.

Yours faithfully,
f Sim Beng Khoon
Director, Travel and Hospitality Business


Complaint made on 2nd November 2004
STB replied on 30th November 2004 - 28 days

This is an example of LC people (PAI, AMCIS) who behave as if they have mandate from the Emperor.


Friday, 30 May 2008

Email to Dr Vivian Balakrishnan - Minister's Endorsement

Email to Dr Vivian Balakrishnan

Subject: Re : Minister's endorsement                                           

Dear Dr Vivian Balakrishnan

I wish to bring your attention to a pamphlet
distributed by AMCIS. There is a huge picture
of you officiating at the opening of AMCIS
Homestay Services on 27th August 2004. These
pamphlets were distributed to many foreigners.
It conveys the message that a Singaporean
Minister endorses the services this organisation
provides.

On 1st November 2004, I was loudly told off by
the person-in-charge of this organisation that
my small company is 'unofficial' because I do
not have the support of STB nor a Minister to
officiate my company's opening.

Attached is the complaint I made against
this organisation.

I personally believe, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan,
that when you endorse a product, company or an
individual, if anything goes wrong, it reflects
badly on you. People might mistake it as your
recommendation.


Your good name has been used to scare me.
Should I feel intimidated?


Regards
Jayne Goh
2nd November 2004

************************ooOoo***********************

Thank you for your email.
I have asked STB to look into this matter and
revert to you.

Regards,
Vivian Balakrishnan
8/11/2004


Complaint made on 2nd Nov 2004
Dr Vivian Balakrsihnan replied on 8th November 2004 - 6 days